The CJEU rules: No right to reimbursement of the flight ticket from the air carrier on package travels
The Directive on package travel and Regulation 261 are relatives in a way, but there seems to be some trouble in the family. The relation between the two sets of rules gives rise to a larger number of cases as the number of passengers, who purchase their flight ticket as part of a package travel, is increasing.
Recently, such a case was presented for the CJEU. The Court established that a passenger has the right to hold his tour organizer liable for reimbursement of the cost of the air ticket according to The Directive on package travel. On the contrary, the passenger cannot claim reimbursement of the cost of the ticket from the operating air carrier pursuant to Regulation 261.
In the present matter, a group of passengers had bought a package travel through a travel agency from the Netherlands to Corfu in Greece. The travel agency had obtained airline tickets through a charter agency, which had chartered several seats from Aegean Airlines. Meanwhile, Aegean decided to cancel the planned flights to Corfu, as the travel agency was no longer able to pay the price which the companies had agreed on. A few days before the agreed departure date, the travel agency therefore informed the passengers that the package tour had been cancelled. Soon after, the travel agency was declared insolvent. The passengers claimed that according to Regulation 261, Aegean Airlines was obliged to compensate them for the cancellation of the flight and to reimburse the price of the related tickets.
Rechtbank Noord-Nederland (District Court, Noord-Nederland, Netherlands) awarded the passengers compensation from Aegean on account of the cancellation of the flight pursuant to Regulation 261. However, the Court did not rule on the question of reimbursement of the flight tickets. In that regard, Aegean argued that since the tickets were purchased as part of a package tour, the operating air carrier was not obliged to reimburse the cost of the tickets.
Consequently, it was up to the CJEU to decide whether a passenger who has the right to hold his tour organizer liable for reimbursement of the cost of his flight ticket under The Directive on package travel, also has the right to claim reimbursement from the air carrier on the basis of Regulation 261. Furthermore, it was requested what the passenger’s rights are when the tour organizer has been declared insolvent and has not taken any safeguard measures to guarantee the reimbursement.
No double securing of the passenger
The CJEU established that passengers who, under The Directive on package travel, have the right to hold the tour organizer liable for reimbursement of the cost of the air ticket, are not likewise entitled to claim reimbursement from the operating air carrier pursuant to Regulation 261. This also applies, when the tour organizer has been declared insolvent, even though it will prevent the passenger from getting the cost of the air ticket reimbursed.
The Court reinforced that the right to reimbursement of the cost of the flight ticket, pursuant to Regulation 261 and The Directive on package travel, are not cumulative as the passengers concerned would receive unjustified overcompensation. Thus, the operating air carrier does not assume part of the liability of the tour organizer towards its clients.
IUNO’s opinion
The CJEU ruling is good news for the air carriers, but less good news for package travel passengers. When a package travel is cancelled, the passenger will still have the right to claim compensation from the operating air carrier according to Regulation 261. However, the claim for reimbursement of the air ticket must be directed against the tour organizer. This also applies when the tour organizer has been declared bankrupt. Yet, The Travel Guarantee Fund will possibly cover the passenger’s expenses if the travel provider is insolvent. This only requires that the provider is registered in the Fund and that the passenger has paid for the package travel concerned.
Recently, such a case was presented for the CJEU. The Court established that a passenger has the right to hold his tour organizer liable for reimbursement of the cost of the air ticket according to The Directive on package travel. On the contrary, the passenger cannot claim reimbursement of the cost of the ticket from the operating air carrier pursuant to Regulation 261.
In the present matter, a group of passengers had bought a package travel through a travel agency from the Netherlands to Corfu in Greece. The travel agency had obtained airline tickets through a charter agency, which had chartered several seats from Aegean Airlines. Meanwhile, Aegean decided to cancel the planned flights to Corfu, as the travel agency was no longer able to pay the price which the companies had agreed on. A few days before the agreed departure date, the travel agency therefore informed the passengers that the package tour had been cancelled. Soon after, the travel agency was declared insolvent. The passengers claimed that according to Regulation 261, Aegean Airlines was obliged to compensate them for the cancellation of the flight and to reimburse the price of the related tickets.
Rechtbank Noord-Nederland (District Court, Noord-Nederland, Netherlands) awarded the passengers compensation from Aegean on account of the cancellation of the flight pursuant to Regulation 261. However, the Court did not rule on the question of reimbursement of the flight tickets. In that regard, Aegean argued that since the tickets were purchased as part of a package tour, the operating air carrier was not obliged to reimburse the cost of the tickets.
Consequently, it was up to the CJEU to decide whether a passenger who has the right to hold his tour organizer liable for reimbursement of the cost of his flight ticket under The Directive on package travel, also has the right to claim reimbursement from the air carrier on the basis of Regulation 261. Furthermore, it was requested what the passenger’s rights are when the tour organizer has been declared insolvent and has not taken any safeguard measures to guarantee the reimbursement.
No double securing of the passenger
The CJEU established that passengers who, under The Directive on package travel, have the right to hold the tour organizer liable for reimbursement of the cost of the air ticket, are not likewise entitled to claim reimbursement from the operating air carrier pursuant to Regulation 261. This also applies, when the tour organizer has been declared insolvent, even though it will prevent the passenger from getting the cost of the air ticket reimbursed.
The Court reinforced that the right to reimbursement of the cost of the flight ticket, pursuant to Regulation 261 and The Directive on package travel, are not cumulative as the passengers concerned would receive unjustified overcompensation. Thus, the operating air carrier does not assume part of the liability of the tour organizer towards its clients.
IUNO’s opinion
The CJEU ruling is good news for the air carriers, but less good news for package travel passengers. When a package travel is cancelled, the passenger will still have the right to claim compensation from the operating air carrier according to Regulation 261. However, the claim for reimbursement of the air ticket must be directed against the tour organizer. This also applies when the tour organizer has been declared bankrupt. Yet, The Travel Guarantee Fund will possibly cover the passenger’s expenses if the travel provider is insolvent. This only requires that the provider is registered in the Fund and that the passenger has paid for the package travel concerned.
Similar
The team

Aage
Krogh
Partner
Adam
Harding Ryyd Lange
Senior legal assistant
Albert
Berg Giese
Junior legal assistant
Amalie
Bjerre Hilmand
Senior legal advisor (leave of absence)
Anna
Bonander
Legal advisor
Anna
Kreutzmann
Legal manager (leave of absence)
Anne
Voigt Kjær
Senior legal assistant
Anton
Winther Hansen
Senior legal advisor
Ashley
Kristine Morton
Legal advisor
Aurora
Maria Thunes Truyen
Associate
Bror
Johan Kristensen
Senior legal advisor
Caroline
Sofie Urup Malmstrøm
Junior legal assistant
Chris
Anders Nielsen
Senior legal advisor
Cille
Fahnø
Junior legal advisor
Clara
Caballero Stephensen
Junior legal advisor
Daniel
Bornhøft Nielsen
Legal assistant
Ea
Tingkær Hesselfeldt
Legal assistant
Ellen
Priess-Hansen
Senior legal assistant
Elvira
Feline Basse Schougaard
Senior legal advisor
Ema
Besic-Ahmetagic
Legal advisor
Feline
Honoré Jepsen
Legal assistant
Fiona
Wahl
Junior legal assistant
Fransine
Andersson
Senior legal advisor
Frederikke
Østerlund Haarder
Senior legal assistant
Frida
Assarson
Associate
Gustav
Vestergaard
Senior legal assistant
Holger
Koch-Klarskov
Legal advisor
Ian
Englev Jensen
Legal assistant
Ida
Marie Skovgaard Rubæk
Legal manager
Izabell
Celina Bastrup Lüthje
Senior legal assistant
Jacqueline
Lucia Chrillesen
Legal assistant
Johanne
Berner Nielsen
Senior legal assistant (leave of absence)
Julia
Wolfe
Legal advisor
Kaisa
Maria Falkenberg Lending
Junior legal assistant
Kaisa
Nova Ordell Guldbrand Thygaard
Legal advisor
Karl Emil
Tang Nielsen
Senior legal assistant
Karoline
Halfdan Petersen
Senior legal manager
Kateryna
Buriak
Legal advisor
Laura
Jørgensen
Senior legal advisor
Luna
Bennesen
Legal assistant
Marie
Møller Christensen
Junior legal advisor
Mathias
Bech Linaa
Legal advisor
Maya
Cecillia Jørgensen
Senior legal advisor
Mie
Lundberg Larsen
Junior legal advisor
Nikita
Brinck Søberg
Senior legal assistant
Nourchaine
Sellami
Legal advisor
Rosa
Gilliam-Vigh
Legal advisor
Selma
Agopian
Senior Associate, EU-advokat
Selma
Klinker Brodersen
Legal advisor
Silja
Brünnich Fogh von Deden
Legal assistant
Silje
Moen Knutsen
Legal advisor
Stine
Bank Olstrøm
Senior legal assistant
Ulrikke
Sejersbøl Christiansen
Junior legal advisor
Victoria
Mai Gregaard Handberg
Legal advisor (leave of absence)