Strike in the sister company
In a new ruling, the Danish Western High Court has determined that a strike in an air carrier's sister company can indeed be considered an extraordinary circumstance beyond the air carrier's control – even if the companies share a common name.
A group of passengers was to travel from Aalborg to Oslo via Copenhagen. Their flight was canceled due to an unlawful strike by ground handling staff, who were employed by a sister company associated with the air carrier, and which had partially the same name as the air carrier. The question was whether the strike could be considered an extraordinary circumstance beyond the air carrier's control that could exempt the air carrier from a compensation claim.
Internal or external
The court concluded that the cancellation was due to external events beyond the air carrier's control. The court emphasized that:
- The strike was unannounced
- The air carrier and the ground handling company had the same parent company but no influence on each other
- The ground handling staff also handled baggage for a number of other air carriers on equal terms with the defendant air carrier
Therefore, the Western High Court found that it was an extraordinary circumstance. The Eastern High Court had previously reached the opposite conclusion in a similar case. The difference was that in this case, sufficient evidence was presented to convince the court that the two companies operated independently of each other – even though they partially shared the same name.
IUNO’s opinion
The case shows that even if an air carrier purchases ground handling services from a sister company, a strike in the sister company should still be considered an external strike if the companies operate independently of each other.
IUNO recommends that air carriers ensure that when they purchase services from affiliated companies, it should be done on an arm's length basis and in such a way that the companies operate independently of each other. If this is adhered to, a strike in a sister company will constitute an extraordinary circumstance. In this way, the air carrier will be exempt from the obligation to pay compensation as a result of the strike.
[The Danish Western High Court's ruling of April 23, 2024, in case BS-31914/2023-VLR]
A group of passengers was to travel from Aalborg to Oslo via Copenhagen. Their flight was canceled due to an unlawful strike by ground handling staff, who were employed by a sister company associated with the air carrier, and which had partially the same name as the air carrier. The question was whether the strike could be considered an extraordinary circumstance beyond the air carrier's control that could exempt the air carrier from a compensation claim.
Internal or external
The court concluded that the cancellation was due to external events beyond the air carrier's control. The court emphasized that:
- The strike was unannounced
- The air carrier and the ground handling company had the same parent company but no influence on each other
- The ground handling staff also handled baggage for a number of other air carriers on equal terms with the defendant air carrier
Therefore, the Western High Court found that it was an extraordinary circumstance. The Eastern High Court had previously reached the opposite conclusion in a similar case. The difference was that in this case, sufficient evidence was presented to convince the court that the two companies operated independently of each other – even though they partially shared the same name.
IUNO’s opinion
The case shows that even if an air carrier purchases ground handling services from a sister company, a strike in the sister company should still be considered an external strike if the companies operate independently of each other.
IUNO recommends that air carriers ensure that when they purchase services from affiliated companies, it should be done on an arm's length basis and in such a way that the companies operate independently of each other. If this is adhered to, a strike in a sister company will constitute an extraordinary circumstance. In this way, the air carrier will be exempt from the obligation to pay compensation as a result of the strike.
[The Danish Western High Court's ruling of April 23, 2024, in case BS-31914/2023-VLR]
Similar
The team

Aage
Krogh
Partner
Adam
Harding Ryyd Lange
Senior legal assistant
Albert
Berg Giese
Junior legal assistant
Amalie
Bjerre Hilmand
Senior legal advisor (leave of absence)
Anna
Bonander
Legal advisor
Anna
Kreutzmann
Legal manager (leave of absence)
Anne
Voigt Kjær
Senior legal assistant
Anton
Winther Hansen
Senior legal advisor
Ashley
Kristine Morton
Legal advisor
Aurora
Maria Thunes Truyen
Associate
Bror
Johan Kristensen
Senior legal advisor
Caroline
Sofie Urup Malmstrøm
Junior legal assistant
Chris
Anders Nielsen
Senior legal advisor
Cille
Fahnø
Junior legal advisor
Clara
Caballero Stephensen
Junior legal advisor
Daniel
Bornhøft Nielsen
Legal assistant
Ea
Tingkær Hesselfeldt
Legal assistant
Ellen
Priess-Hansen
Senior legal assistant
Elvira
Feline Basse Schougaard
Senior legal advisor
Ema
Besic-Ahmetagic
Legal advisor
Feline
Honoré Jepsen
Legal assistant
Fiona
Wahl
Junior legal assistant
Fransine
Andersson
Senior legal advisor
Frederikke
Østerlund Haarder
Senior legal assistant
Frida
Assarson
Associate
Gustav
Vestergaard
Senior legal assistant
Holger
Koch-Klarskov
Legal advisor
Ian
Englev Jensen
Legal assistant
Ida
Marie Skovgaard Rubæk
Legal manager
Izabell
Celina Bastrup Lüthje
Senior legal assistant
Jacqueline
Lucia Chrillesen
Legal assistant
Johanne
Berner Nielsen
Senior legal assistant (leave of absence)
Julia
Wolfe
Legal advisor
Kaisa
Maria Falkenberg Lending
Junior legal assistant
Kaisa
Nova Ordell Guldbrand Thygaard
Legal advisor
Karl Emil
Tang Nielsen
Senior legal assistant
Karoline
Halfdan Petersen
Senior legal manager
Kateryna
Buriak
Legal advisor
Laura
Jørgensen
Senior legal advisor
Luna
Bennesen
Legal assistant
Marie
Møller Christensen
Junior legal advisor
Mathias
Bech Linaa
Legal advisor
Maya
Cecillia Jørgensen
Senior legal advisor
Mie
Lundberg Larsen
Junior legal advisor
Nikita
Brinck Søberg
Senior legal assistant
Nourchaine
Sellami
Legal advisor
Rosa
Gilliam-Vigh
Legal advisor
Selma
Agopian
Senior Associate, EU-advokat
Selma
Klinker Brodersen
Legal advisor
Silja
Brünnich Fogh von Deden
Legal assistant
Silje
Moen Knutsen
Legal advisor
Stine
Bank Olstrøm
Senior legal assistant
Ulrikke
Sejersbøl Christiansen
Junior legal advisor
Victoria
Mai Gregaard Handberg
Legal advisor (leave of absence)