EN
Aviation

Strike in the sister company

logo
Legal news
calendar 12 June 2024
globus Denmark

In a new ruling, the Danish Western High Court has determined that a strike in an air carrier's sister company can indeed be considered an extraordinary circumstance beyond the air carrier's control – even if the companies share a common name.

A group of passengers was to travel from Aalborg to Oslo via Copenhagen. Their flight was canceled due to an unlawful strike by ground handling staff, who were employed by a sister company associated with the air carrier, and which had partially the same name as the air carrier. The question was whether the strike could be considered an extraordinary circumstance beyond the air carrier's control that could exempt the air carrier from a compensation claim.

Internal or external

The court concluded that the cancellation was due to external events beyond the air carrier's control. The court emphasized that:

  • The strike was unannounced
  • The air carrier and the ground handling company had the same parent company but no influence on each other
  • The ground handling staff also handled baggage for a number of other air carriers on equal terms with the defendant air carrier

Therefore, the Western High Court found that it was an extraordinary circumstance. The Eastern High Court had previously reached the opposite conclusion in a similar case. The difference was that in this case, sufficient evidence was presented to convince the court that the two companies operated independently of each other – even though they partially shared the same name.

IUNO’s opinion

The case shows that even if an air carrier purchases ground handling services from a sister company, a strike in the sister company should still be considered an external strike if the companies operate independently of each other.

IUNO recommends that air carriers ensure that when they purchase services from affiliated companies, it should be done on an arm's length basis and in such a way that the companies operate independently of each other. If this is adhered to, a strike in a sister company will constitute an extraordinary circumstance. In this way, the air carrier will be exempt from the obligation to pay compensation as a result of the strike.

[The Danish Western High Court's ruling of April 23, 2024, in case BS-31914/2023-VLR]

A group of passengers was to travel from Aalborg to Oslo via Copenhagen. Their flight was canceled due to an unlawful strike by ground handling staff, who were employed by a sister company associated with the air carrier, and which had partially the same name as the air carrier. The question was whether the strike could be considered an extraordinary circumstance beyond the air carrier's control that could exempt the air carrier from a compensation claim.

Internal or external

The court concluded that the cancellation was due to external events beyond the air carrier's control. The court emphasized that:

  • The strike was unannounced
  • The air carrier and the ground handling company had the same parent company but no influence on each other
  • The ground handling staff also handled baggage for a number of other air carriers on equal terms with the defendant air carrier

Therefore, the Western High Court found that it was an extraordinary circumstance. The Eastern High Court had previously reached the opposite conclusion in a similar case. The difference was that in this case, sufficient evidence was presented to convince the court that the two companies operated independently of each other – even though they partially shared the same name.

IUNO’s opinion

The case shows that even if an air carrier purchases ground handling services from a sister company, a strike in the sister company should still be considered an external strike if the companies operate independently of each other.

IUNO recommends that air carriers ensure that when they purchase services from affiliated companies, it should be done on an arm's length basis and in such a way that the companies operate independently of each other. If this is adhered to, a strike in a sister company will constitute an extraordinary circumstance. In this way, the air carrier will be exempt from the obligation to pay compensation as a result of the strike.

[The Danish Western High Court's ruling of April 23, 2024, in case BS-31914/2023-VLR]

Receive our newsletter

Aage

Krogh

Partner

Similar

logo
Aviation

18 February 2025

A passenger’s own rebooking did not grant compensation

logo
Aviation

22 January 2025

Internal documentation was sufficient

logo
Aviation

18 December 2024

Sweden to abolish aviation tax

logo
Aviation

11 December 2024

ICAO raises airline liability limits

logo
Aviation

19 November 2024

Passenger tax errors will cost DKK 10,000 each

logo
Aviation

30 October 2024

Long delay on the horizon

The team

Aage

Krogh

Partner

Adam

Harding Ryyd Lange

Senior legal assistant

Albert

Berg Giese

Junior legal assistant

Amalie

Bjerre Hilmand

Senior legal advisor (leave of absence)

Anna

Bonander

Legal advisor

Anna

Kreutzmann

Legal manager (leave of absence)

Anne

Voigt Kjær

Senior legal assistant

Anton

Winther Hansen

Senior legal advisor

Ashley

Kristine Morton

Legal advisor

Aurora

Maria Thunes Truyen

Associate

Bror

Johan Kristensen

Senior legal advisor

Caroline

Sofie Urup Malmstrøm

Junior legal assistant

Chris

Anders Nielsen

Senior legal advisor

Cille

Fahnø

Junior legal advisor

Clara

Caballero Stephensen

Junior legal advisor

Daniel

Bornhøft Nielsen

Legal assistant

Ea

Tingkær Hesselfeldt

Legal assistant

Ellen

Priess-Hansen

Senior legal assistant

Elvira

Feline Basse Schougaard

Senior legal advisor

Ema

Besic-Ahmetagic

Legal advisor

Feline

Honoré Jepsen

Legal assistant

Fiona

Wahl

Junior legal assistant

Fransine

Andersson

Senior legal advisor

Frederikke

Østerlund Haarder

Senior legal assistant

Frida

Assarson

Associate

Gustav

Vestergaard

Senior legal assistant

Holger

Koch-Klarskov

Legal advisor

Ian

Englev Jensen

Legal assistant

Ida

Marie Skovgaard Rubæk

Legal manager

Izabell

Celina Bastrup Lüthje

Senior legal assistant

Jacqueline

Lucia Chrillesen

Legal assistant

Johanne

Berner Nielsen

Senior legal assistant (leave of absence)

Julia

Wolfe

Legal advisor

Kaisa

Maria Falkenberg Lending

Junior legal assistant

Kaisa

Nova Ordell Guldbrand Thygaard

Legal advisor

Karl Emil

Tang Nielsen

Senior legal assistant

Karoline

Halfdan Petersen

Senior legal manager

Kateryna

Buriak

Legal advisor

Laura

Jørgensen

Senior legal advisor

Luna

Bennesen

Legal assistant

Marie

Møller Christensen

Junior legal advisor

Mathias

Bech Linaa

Legal advisor

Maya

Cecillia Jørgensen

Senior legal advisor

Mie

Lundberg Larsen

Junior legal advisor

Nikita

Brinck Søberg

Senior legal assistant

Nourchaine

Sellami

Legal advisor

Rosa

Gilliam-Vigh

Legal advisor

Selma

Agopian

Senior Associate, EU-advokat

Selma

Klinker Brodersen

Legal advisor

Silja

Brünnich Fogh von Deden

Legal assistant

Silje

Moen Knutsen

Legal advisor

Stine

Bank Olstrøm

Senior legal assistant

Ulrikke

Sejersbøl Christiansen

Junior legal advisor

Victoria

Mai Gregaard Handberg

Legal advisor (leave of absence)

Viktoria

Eline Hegelund

Junior legal assistant