EN
Aviation

Regulation 261/2004 does not cover helicopter transport

logo
Legal news
calendar 22 April 2025

A new judgment from the Copenhagen City Court confirms that Regulation 261/2004 does not apply to air travel involving both fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters.

Two passengers claimed compensation after part of their flight was cancelled. The cancelled segment was supposed to be operated by helicopter. The key question in the case became whether helicopter transport, as part of an overall flight journey, is covered by Regulation 261/2004.

When a journey consists of several flights, the journey must be completed with a directly connecting fixed-wing aircraft to be covered by the regulation. The Copenhagen City Court found that helicopters cannot be considered "fixed-wing aircraft" under the regulation.

The court also emphasised that no evidence suggested that the passengers were unaware that the final part of the journey would be conducted by helicopter. Therefore, the case was dismissed.

IUNO’s opinion

The case shows that helicopter transport cannot constitute a direct flight connection under Regulation 261/2004. This is why airlines are not required to pay compensation if they cancel the part of the journey intended to be operated by helicopter.

However, IUNO recommends that airlines inform passengers if any part of the flight will be conducted by helicopter. It may prove crucial whether passengers were aware of this.

[Copenhagen City Court judgment of 11 October 2024 in case BS-5207/2023-KBH]

Two passengers claimed compensation after part of their flight was cancelled. The cancelled segment was supposed to be operated by helicopter. The key question in the case became whether helicopter transport, as part of an overall flight journey, is covered by Regulation 261/2004.

When a journey consists of several flights, the journey must be completed with a directly connecting fixed-wing aircraft to be covered by the regulation. The Copenhagen City Court found that helicopters cannot be considered "fixed-wing aircraft" under the regulation.

The court also emphasised that no evidence suggested that the passengers were unaware that the final part of the journey would be conducted by helicopter. Therefore, the case was dismissed.

IUNO’s opinion

The case shows that helicopter transport cannot constitute a direct flight connection under Regulation 261/2004. This is why airlines are not required to pay compensation if they cancel the part of the journey intended to be operated by helicopter.

However, IUNO recommends that airlines inform passengers if any part of the flight will be conducted by helicopter. It may prove crucial whether passengers were aware of this.

[Copenhagen City Court judgment of 11 October 2024 in case BS-5207/2023-KBH]

Receive our newsletter

Aage

Krogh

Partner

Selma

Agopian

Senior Associate, EU-advokat

Similar

logo
Aviation

18 February 2025

A passenger’s own rebooking did not grant compensation

logo
Aviation

22 January 2025

Internal documentation was sufficient

logo
Aviation

18 December 2024

Sweden to abolish aviation tax

logo
Aviation

11 December 2024

ICAO raises airline liability limits

logo
Aviation

19 November 2024

Passenger tax errors will cost DKK 10,000 each

logo
Aviation

30 October 2024

Long delay on the horizon

The team

Aage

Krogh

Partner

Adam

Harding Ryyd Lange

Senior legal assistant

Albert

Berg Giese

Junior legal assistant

Amalie

Bjerre Hilmand

Senior legal advisor

Anna

Bonander

Legal advisor

Anna

Kreutzmann

Legal manager (leave of absence)

Anne

Voigt Kjær

Senior legal assistant

Anton

Winther Hansen

Senior legal advisor

Ashley

Kristine Morton

Legal advisor

Aurora

Maria Thunes Truyen

Associate

Bror

Johan Kristensen

Senior legal advisor

Caroline

Sofie Urup Malmstrøm

Legal assistant

Chris

Anders Nielsen

Senior legal advisor

Cille

Fahnø

Junior legal advisor

Clara

Caballero Stephensen

Junior legal advisor

Daniel

Bornhøft Nielsen

Legal assistant

Ea

Tingkær Hesselfeldt

Legal assistant

Ellen

Priess-Hansen

Senior legal assistant

Elvira

Feline Basse Schougaard

Senior legal advisor

Ema

Besic-Ahmetagic

Legal advisor

Feline

Honoré Jepsen

Legal assistant

Fiona

Wahl

Junior legal assistant

Fransine

Andersson

Senior legal advisor

Frederikke

Østerlund Haarder

Senior legal assistant

Frida

Assarson

Associate

Gustav

Vestergaard

Senior legal assistant

Holger

Koch-Klarskov

Legal advisor

Ian

Englev Jensen

Legal assistant

Ida

Marie Skovgaard Rubæk

Senior legal manager

Izabell

Celina Bastrup Lüthje

Senior legal assistant

Johanne

Berner Nielsen

Senior legal assistant

Julia

Wolfe

Legal advisor

Kaisa

Maria Falkenberg Lending

Junior legal assistant

Kaisa

Nova Ordell Guldbrand Thygaard

Senior legal advisor

Karl Emil

Tang Nielsen

Senior legal assistant

Karoline

Halfdan Petersen

Senior legal manager (leave of absence)

Kateryna

Buriak

Legal advisor

Laura

Jørgensen

Senior legal advisor

Luna

Bennesen

Legal assistant

Marie

Møller Christensen

Junior legal advisor

Mathias

Bech Linaa

Legal advisor

Maya

Cecillia Jørgensen

Senior legal advisor

Mie

Lundberg Larsen

Junior legal advisor

Nikita

Brinck Søberg

Senior legal assistant

Nourchaine

Sellami

Legal advisor

Rosa

Gilliam-Vigh

Legal advisor

Selma

Agopian

Senior Associate, EU-advokat

Selma

Klinker Brodersen

Legal advisor

Silja

Brünnich Fogh von Deden

Legal assistant

Silje

Moen Knutsen

Legal advisor

Stine

Bank Olstrøm

Senior legal assistant

Ulrikke

Sejersbøl Christiansen

Junior legal advisor

Victoria

Mai Gregaard Handberg

Legal advisor (leave of absence)

Viktoria

Eline Hegelund

Junior legal assistant