EN
Aviation

Long delay on the horizon

logo
Legal news
calendar 30 October 2024
globus Denmark

A passenger was informed of an expected long delay before departure and chose not to be present at check-in or boarding. The European Court of Justice ruled that the passenger should have been present at check-in to claim compensation.

Before departure, a passenger was informed that his flight was going to be delayed. The passenger decided not to show up for check-in or boarding for the flight, which arrived with a delay of over three hours. He claimed compensation for the delay he would have experienced had he been on the flight.

No compensation for no-shows

The general rule is that a passenger must be present at check-in to claim compensation for a delay. This is not a requirement if the flight is canceled. In this case, the question was whether presence at check-in is also required when there is a prospect of a long delay before boarding.

The European Court of Justice concluded that the general rule requiring a passenger to be present at check-in to be able to claim compensation for a delay also applies when there is a prospect of a long delay before boarding. If the passenger has checked in online, they must be present at the airport in a timely manner with an airline representative.

IUNO's opinion

The case shows that even if a long delay is expected, a passenger must make sure to check-in. If the passenger has checked in online, they must present themselves at the airport with an airline representative.

IUNO recommends that airlines check whether passengers were present at check-in before paying compensation in a delay case.

[Judgment of the European Court of Justice of 25 January 2024 in case C-474/22]

Before departure, a passenger was informed that his flight was going to be delayed. The passenger decided not to show up for check-in or boarding for the flight, which arrived with a delay of over three hours. He claimed compensation for the delay he would have experienced had he been on the flight.

No compensation for no-shows

The general rule is that a passenger must be present at check-in to claim compensation for a delay. This is not a requirement if the flight is canceled. In this case, the question was whether presence at check-in is also required when there is a prospect of a long delay before boarding.

The European Court of Justice concluded that the general rule requiring a passenger to be present at check-in to be able to claim compensation for a delay also applies when there is a prospect of a long delay before boarding. If the passenger has checked in online, they must be present at the airport in a timely manner with an airline representative.

IUNO's opinion

The case shows that even if a long delay is expected, a passenger must make sure to check-in. If the passenger has checked in online, they must present themselves at the airport with an airline representative.

IUNO recommends that airlines check whether passengers were present at check-in before paying compensation in a delay case.

[Judgment of the European Court of Justice of 25 January 2024 in case C-474/22]

Receive our newsletter

Aage

Krogh

Partner

Similar

logo
Aviation

9 October 2024

Staff shortages in baggage handling can be an extraordinary circumstance

logo
Aviation

18 September 2024

Guidelines for the Danish air passenger tax

logo
Aviation

18 September 2024

Denmark introduces new air passenger tax

logo
Aviation

12 June 2024

Strike in the sister company

logo
Aviation

22 May 2024

Sudden illness was an unusual circumstance

logo
Aviation

3 May 2024

Proof of payment

The team

Aage

Krogh

Partner

Adam

Harding Ryyd Lange

Legal assistant

Amalie

Bjerre Hilmand

Legal advisor

Amalie

Sofie Sveen Kvam

Legal assistant

Amanda

Jepsen Bregnhardt

Senior legal assistant

Andrea

Brix Danielsen

Legal advisor

Anna

Bonander

Legal advisor

Anna

Kreutzmann

Senior legal assistant

Anne

Voigt Kjær

Junior legal advisor

Anton

Winther Hansen

Legal advisor

Ashley

Kristine Morton

Legal advisor

Aurora

Maria Thunes Truyen

Junior associate

Benedicte

Rodian

Senior legal assistant

Bror

Johan Kristensen

Senior legal advisor

Chanel

Adzioski

Junior legal assistant

Chris

Anders Nielsen

Senior legal advisor

Cille

Fahnø

Junior legal advisor

Clara

Caballero Stephensen

Junior legal advisor

Daniel

Bornhøft Nielsen

Junior legal assistant

Ellen

Priess-Hansen

Senior legal assistant

Elvira

Feline Basse Schougaard

Senior legal advisor

Ema

Besic-Ahmetagic

Legal advisor

Emilia

Naledi Madonsela Mikkelsen

Junior legal assistant

Emma

Engvang Hansen

Senior legal assistant

Emma

Frøslev Larsen

Legal manager

Fransine

Andersson

Legal advisor

Frederikke

Kirkegaard Thalund

Legal assistant

Frederikke

Østerlund Haarder

Junior legal advisor

Frida

Aas Ahlquist

Legal assistant

Frida

Assarson

Senior legal advisor

Holger

Koch-Klarskov

Junior legal assistant

Ian

Englev Jensen

Junior legal assistant

Izabell

Celina Bastrup Lüthje

Senior legal assistant

Jacqueline

Lucia Chrillesen

Junior legal assistant

Johanne

Berner Nielsen

Senior legal assistant

Julia

Wolfe

Legal advisor

Kaisa

Nova Ordell Guldbrand Thygaard

Legal advisor

Karl Emil

Tang Nielsen

Legal assistant

Karoline

Halfdan Petersen

Legal manager

Karoline

Nordved

Legal assistant

Kateryna

Buriak

Legal advisor

Laura

Jørgensen

Senior legal advisor

Mathias

Bech Linaa

Junior legal advisor

Maya

Cecillia Jørgensen

Senior legal advisor

Mie

Lundberg Larsen

Junior legal advisor

Nanna

Damkjær

Junior legal assistant

Nourchaine

Sellami

Legal advisor

Rosa

Gilliam-Vigh

Legal advisor

Selma

Agopian

Senior EU associate

Selma

Klinker Brodersen

Junior legal advisor

Silja

Brünnich Fogh von Deden

Junior legal assistant

Silje

Moen Knutsen

Legal advisor

Stine

Bank Olstrøm

Senior legal assistant

Ulrikke

Sejersbøl Christiansen

Legal assistant

Victoria

Mai Gregaard Handberg

Junior legal assistant