Long delay on the horizon
A passenger was informed of an expected long delay before departure and chose not to be present at check-in or boarding. The European Court of Justice ruled that the passenger should have been present at check-in to claim compensation.
Before departure, a passenger was informed that his flight was going to be delayed. The passenger decided not to show up for check-in or boarding for the flight, which arrived with a delay of over three hours. He claimed compensation for the delay he would have experienced had he been on the flight.
No compensation for no-shows
The general rule is that a passenger must be present at check-in to claim compensation for a delay. This is not a requirement if the flight is canceled. In this case, the question was whether presence at check-in is also required when there is a prospect of a long delay before boarding.
The European Court of Justice concluded that the general rule requiring a passenger to be present at check-in to be able to claim compensation for a delay also applies when there is a prospect of a long delay before boarding. If the passenger has checked in online, they must be present at the airport in a timely manner with an airline representative.
IUNO's opinion
The case shows that even if a long delay is expected, a passenger must make sure to check-in. If the passenger has checked in online, they must present themselves at the airport with an airline representative.
IUNO recommends that airlines check whether passengers were present at check-in before paying compensation in a delay case.
[Judgment of the European Court of Justice of 25 January 2024 in case C-474/22]
Before departure, a passenger was informed that his flight was going to be delayed. The passenger decided not to show up for check-in or boarding for the flight, which arrived with a delay of over three hours. He claimed compensation for the delay he would have experienced had he been on the flight.
No compensation for no-shows
The general rule is that a passenger must be present at check-in to claim compensation for a delay. This is not a requirement if the flight is canceled. In this case, the question was whether presence at check-in is also required when there is a prospect of a long delay before boarding.
The European Court of Justice concluded that the general rule requiring a passenger to be present at check-in to be able to claim compensation for a delay also applies when there is a prospect of a long delay before boarding. If the passenger has checked in online, they must be present at the airport in a timely manner with an airline representative.
IUNO's opinion
The case shows that even if a long delay is expected, a passenger must make sure to check-in. If the passenger has checked in online, they must present themselves at the airport with an airline representative.
IUNO recommends that airlines check whether passengers were present at check-in before paying compensation in a delay case.
[Judgment of the European Court of Justice of 25 January 2024 in case C-474/22]
Similar
The team

Aage
Krogh
Partner
Adam
Harding Ryyd Lange
Senior legal assistant
Albert
Berg Giese
Junior legal assistant
Amalie
Bjerre Hilmand
Senior legal advisor (leave of absence)
Anna
Bonander
Legal advisor
Anna
Kreutzmann
Legal manager (leave of absence)
Anne
Voigt Kjær
Senior legal assistant
Anton
Winther Hansen
Senior legal advisor
Ashley
Kristine Morton
Legal advisor
Aurora
Maria Thunes Truyen
Associate
Bror
Johan Kristensen
Senior legal advisor
Caroline
Sofie Urup Malmstrøm
Junior legal assistant
Chris
Anders Nielsen
Senior legal advisor
Cille
Fahnø
Junior legal advisor
Clara
Caballero Stephensen
Junior legal advisor
Daniel
Bornhøft Nielsen
Legal assistant
Ea
Tingkær Hesselfeldt
Legal assistant
Ellen
Priess-Hansen
Senior legal assistant
Elvira
Feline Basse Schougaard
Senior legal advisor
Ema
Besic-Ahmetagic
Legal advisor
Feline
Honoré Jepsen
Legal assistant
Fiona
Wahl
Junior legal assistant
Fransine
Andersson
Senior legal advisor
Frederikke
Østerlund Haarder
Senior legal assistant
Frida
Assarson
Associate
Gustav
Vestergaard
Senior legal assistant
Holger
Koch-Klarskov
Legal advisor
Ian
Englev Jensen
Legal assistant
Ida
Marie Skovgaard Rubæk
Legal manager
Izabell
Celina Bastrup Lüthje
Senior legal assistant
Jacqueline
Lucia Chrillesen
Legal assistant
Johanne
Berner Nielsen
Senior legal assistant (leave of absence)
Julia
Wolfe
Legal advisor
Kaisa
Maria Falkenberg Lending
Junior legal assistant
Kaisa
Nova Ordell Guldbrand Thygaard
Legal advisor
Karl Emil
Tang Nielsen
Senior legal assistant
Karoline
Halfdan Petersen
Senior legal manager
Kateryna
Buriak
Legal advisor
Laura
Jørgensen
Senior legal advisor
Luna
Bennesen
Legal assistant
Marie
Møller Christensen
Junior legal advisor
Mathias
Bech Linaa
Legal advisor
Maya
Cecillia Jørgensen
Senior legal advisor
Mie
Lundberg Larsen
Junior legal advisor
Nikita
Brinck Søberg
Senior legal assistant
Nourchaine
Sellami
Legal advisor
Rosa
Gilliam-Vigh
Legal advisor
Selma
Agopian
Senior Associate, EU-advokat
Selma
Klinker Brodersen
Legal advisor
Silja
Brünnich Fogh von Deden
Legal assistant
Silje
Moen Knutsen
Legal advisor
Stine
Bank Olstrøm
Senior legal assistant
Ulrikke
Sejersbøl Christiansen
Junior legal advisor
Victoria
Mai Gregaard Handberg
Legal advisor (leave of absence)