EN
Aviation

How to handle claims for ticket refund or compensation due the coronavirus

logo
Legal news
calendar 3 March 2020
globus Denmark

As the Coronavirus, COVID-19, continues to tighten its grip on many popular travel destination, air carriers and travel agencies face anxious passengers wanting to cancel or postpone their flight or package travel. The question is: Under what circumstances will that be possible? And is the passenger entitled to a refund? The laws that apply for air carriers and travel agencies differ in this regard.   

Package travels: Termination possible, but it depends

According to EU Directive 2015/2302, a passenger has the right to terminate the package travel contract before the beginning of the journey without paying any termination fee in the event of:

  • unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances
  • occurring at the place of destination or its immediate vicinity
  • which significantly affects the performance of the package, or which significantly affects the carriage of passengers to the destination.

Under such circumstances, the passenger is entitled to a full refund of any payments made for the package travel, but shall not be entitled to additional compensation, e.g. compensation in accordance with EU Regulation 261/2004.

Unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances are linked to the definition of force majeure. This may cover for example warfare, other serious security problems such as terrorism, significant risks to human health such as the outbreak of a serious disease at the travel destination, or natural disasters such as floods, earthquakes or weather conditions, which makes it impossible to travel safely to the destination as agreed in the package travel contract. The key issue is the safety aspect: is it actually safe to travel to the destination in question – or not? If answered affirmatively, it will then have to be assessed whether or not the “unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances” were present when the package travel was purchased, or if the circumstances significantly has worsened after the conclusion of the contract.

If the passenger was aware or should have been aware of e.g. the current threat level of a pandemic disease in a major European city, and decided in spite thereof to purchase a flight ticket to said city, he will not be entitled to receive a full refund of the ticket price or terminate the package travel contract without paying a termination fee to the package travel agency. However, if it can be proved by the passenger, that the situation at the destination in question has significantly worsened since the package travel was purchased, he might still be able to cancel his travel free of charge and receive a full ticket refund. The burden of proof in this scenario lies with the passenger.

Governmental guidelines requesting travelers to be cautious when travelling to a certain destination is usually not enough on its own for a passenger to be entitled to terminate his package travel contract without paying a termination fee. However, a travel warning advising passengers “to avoid unnecessary travel” to a certain destination would under most circumstances be classified as an “unavoidable and extraordinary circumstance, which significantly affects the performance of the package, or which significantly affects the carriage of passengers to the destination” in accordance with Article 12.2 of EU Directive 2015/2302. Thus, travel guidelines requesting “general alertness” is different from a travel warning, the biggest difference between the two being the urgency of the situation. A warning will only be issued when it is considered unsafe to travel to a certain destination. However, in all circumstances it must be sufficiently and objectively proven that the “unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances” at the destination in question severely hampers the safety of the passenger or has the ability to do so.

Air Carriers: No obligation to reimburse or pay compensation

For air carriers that have only issued a flight ticket and not offered any package travel services, the situation is more uncertain. It is up to each individual Member State to stipulate what rules apply for an air carrier that has issued a flight ticket, when a passenger wishes to cancel his trip due to a governmental travel warning.

In Denmark, the passenger will normally not be entitled to cancel his travel and receive a full refund of the price of the flight ticket under such circumstances, unless the refund policy of the air carrier provides for this. If travel insurance has been taken out (e.g. by purchase with a major credit card) the passenger may be entitled to insurance cover, depending on the circumstances and the wording of the policy.

What if the flight is cancelled?

As we have seen over the last weeks, air carriers may also themselves decide to cancel flights to some destination due to concerns for crew safety. As to a claim for compensation under EU Regulation 261/2004, a cancellation by the air carrier due to a governmental travel warning would be considered as an extraordinary circumstance in accordance with Article 5.3. Thus, passengers travelling from or to a Member State will only receive a ticket refund but will not be further compensated, should the air carrier decide to cancel a flight due to e.g. the destination being in a state of emergency.

IUNO’s opinion

When handling ticket refund claims or – when the air carrier has cancelled the flight due to the coronavirus – claims that concern compensation under EU Regulation 261, air carriers and travel agencies must look into the nature of the official governmental warnings that have been issued regarding the destination in question. In relation to claims for refund of a package travel, the time of purchase is also important.

Package travels: Termination possible, but it depends

According to EU Directive 2015/2302, a passenger has the right to terminate the package travel contract before the beginning of the journey without paying any termination fee in the event of:

  • unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances
  • occurring at the place of destination or its immediate vicinity
  • which significantly affects the performance of the package, or which significantly affects the carriage of passengers to the destination.

Under such circumstances, the passenger is entitled to a full refund of any payments made for the package travel, but shall not be entitled to additional compensation, e.g. compensation in accordance with EU Regulation 261/2004.

Unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances are linked to the definition of force majeure. This may cover for example warfare, other serious security problems such as terrorism, significant risks to human health such as the outbreak of a serious disease at the travel destination, or natural disasters such as floods, earthquakes or weather conditions, which makes it impossible to travel safely to the destination as agreed in the package travel contract. The key issue is the safety aspect: is it actually safe to travel to the destination in question – or not? If answered affirmatively, it will then have to be assessed whether or not the “unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances” were present when the package travel was purchased, or if the circumstances significantly has worsened after the conclusion of the contract.

If the passenger was aware or should have been aware of e.g. the current threat level of a pandemic disease in a major European city, and decided in spite thereof to purchase a flight ticket to said city, he will not be entitled to receive a full refund of the ticket price or terminate the package travel contract without paying a termination fee to the package travel agency. However, if it can be proved by the passenger, that the situation at the destination in question has significantly worsened since the package travel was purchased, he might still be able to cancel his travel free of charge and receive a full ticket refund. The burden of proof in this scenario lies with the passenger.

Governmental guidelines requesting travelers to be cautious when travelling to a certain destination is usually not enough on its own for a passenger to be entitled to terminate his package travel contract without paying a termination fee. However, a travel warning advising passengers “to avoid unnecessary travel” to a certain destination would under most circumstances be classified as an “unavoidable and extraordinary circumstance, which significantly affects the performance of the package, or which significantly affects the carriage of passengers to the destination” in accordance with Article 12.2 of EU Directive 2015/2302. Thus, travel guidelines requesting “general alertness” is different from a travel warning, the biggest difference between the two being the urgency of the situation. A warning will only be issued when it is considered unsafe to travel to a certain destination. However, in all circumstances it must be sufficiently and objectively proven that the “unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances” at the destination in question severely hampers the safety of the passenger or has the ability to do so.

Air Carriers: No obligation to reimburse or pay compensation

For air carriers that have only issued a flight ticket and not offered any package travel services, the situation is more uncertain. It is up to each individual Member State to stipulate what rules apply for an air carrier that has issued a flight ticket, when a passenger wishes to cancel his trip due to a governmental travel warning.

In Denmark, the passenger will normally not be entitled to cancel his travel and receive a full refund of the price of the flight ticket under such circumstances, unless the refund policy of the air carrier provides for this. If travel insurance has been taken out (e.g. by purchase with a major credit card) the passenger may be entitled to insurance cover, depending on the circumstances and the wording of the policy.

What if the flight is cancelled?

As we have seen over the last weeks, air carriers may also themselves decide to cancel flights to some destination due to concerns for crew safety. As to a claim for compensation under EU Regulation 261/2004, a cancellation by the air carrier due to a governmental travel warning would be considered as an extraordinary circumstance in accordance with Article 5.3. Thus, passengers travelling from or to a Member State will only receive a ticket refund but will not be further compensated, should the air carrier decide to cancel a flight due to e.g. the destination being in a state of emergency.

IUNO’s opinion

When handling ticket refund claims or – when the air carrier has cancelled the flight due to the coronavirus – claims that concern compensation under EU Regulation 261, air carriers and travel agencies must look into the nature of the official governmental warnings that have been issued regarding the destination in question. In relation to claims for refund of a package travel, the time of purchase is also important.

Receive our newsletter

Aage

Krogh

Partner

Similar

logo
Aviation

30 October 2024

Long delay on the horizon

logo
Aviation

9 October 2024

Staff shortages in baggage handling can be an extraordinary circumstance

logo
Aviation

18 September 2024

Guidelines for the Danish air passenger tax

logo
Aviation

18 September 2024

Denmark introduces new air passenger tax

logo
Aviation

12 June 2024

Strike in the sister company

logo
Aviation

22 May 2024

Sudden illness was an unusual circumstance

The team

Aage

Krogh

Partner

Adam

Harding Ryyd Lange

Legal assistant

Amalie

Bjerre Hilmand

Legal advisor

Amalie

Sofie Sveen Kvam

Legal assistant

Amanda

Jepsen Bregnhardt

Senior legal assistant

Andrea

Brix Danielsen

Legal advisor

Anna

Bonander

Legal advisor

Anna

Kreutzmann

Senior legal assistant

Anne

Voigt Kjær

Junior legal advisor

Anton

Winther Hansen

Legal advisor

Ashley

Kristine Morton

Legal advisor

Aurora

Maria Thunes Truyen

Junior associate

Benedicte

Rodian

Senior legal assistant

Bror

Johan Kristensen

Senior legal advisor

Chanel

Adzioski

Junior legal assistant

Chris

Anders Nielsen

Senior legal advisor

Cille

Fahnø

Junior legal advisor

Clara

Caballero Stephensen

Junior legal advisor

Daniel

Bornhøft Nielsen

Junior legal assistant

Ellen

Priess-Hansen

Senior legal assistant

Elvira

Feline Basse Schougaard

Senior legal advisor

Ema

Besic-Ahmetagic

Legal advisor

Emilia

Naledi Madonsela Mikkelsen

Junior legal assistant

Emma

Engvang Hansen

Senior legal assistant

Emma

Frøslev Larsen

Legal manager

Fransine

Andersson

Legal advisor

Frederikke

Kirkegaard Thalund

Legal assistant

Frederikke

Østerlund Haarder

Junior legal advisor

Frida

Aas Ahlquist

Legal assistant

Frida

Assarson

Senior legal advisor

Holger

Koch-Klarskov

Junior legal assistant

Ian

Englev Jensen

Junior legal assistant

Izabell

Celina Bastrup Lüthje

Senior legal assistant

Jacqueline

Lucia Chrillesen

Junior legal assistant

Johanne

Berner Nielsen

Senior legal assistant

Josefine

Sørensen

Junior legal assistant

Julia

Wolfe

Legal advisor

Kaisa

Nova Ordell Guldbrand Thygaard

Legal advisor

Karl Emil

Tang Nielsen

Legal assistant

Karoline

Halfdan Petersen

Legal manager

Karoline

Nordved

Legal assistant

Kateryna

Buriak

Legal advisor

Laura

Jørgensen

Senior legal advisor

Mathias

Bech Linaa

Junior legal advisor

Maya

Cecillia Jørgensen

Senior legal advisor

Mie

Lundberg Larsen

Junior legal advisor

Nanna

Damkjær

Junior legal assistant

Nourchaine

Sellami

Legal advisor

Rosa

Gilliam-Vigh

Legal advisor

Selma

Agopian

Senior EU associate

Selma

Klinker Brodersen

Junior legal advisor

Silja

Brünnich Fogh von Deden

Junior legal assistant

Silje

Moen Knutsen

Legal advisor

Stine

Bank Olstrøm

Senior legal assistant

Ulrikke

Sejersbøl Christiansen

Legal assistant

Victoria

Mai Gregaard Handberg

Junior legal assistant