EN
HR Legal

Employee was not bound by unfair non-competition clause

logo
Legal news
calendar 27 February 2025
globus Sweden

An Arbitration Tribunal has found that an unfair non-competition clause did not bind an employee. The employee had not been in a senior role and had had limited access to company secrets during his employment.

A sales representative at a hardware chain was bound by a non-competition clause in his employment contract. When he resigned a few years later, the company informed him that the non-competition clause would be valid for three months. During those three months, he would receive 60 % of his monthly salary.

One month later, he became a sales manager at another hardware chain. As a result, the company wanted compensation for breach of the non-competition clause.

The Arbitration Tribunal found that the non-competition clause was unenforceable and rejected the company’s claim for compensation. The clause was too restrictive as the employee had not been employed in a senior role. Although he had gained insight into some company secrets, it was not enough to justify the financial burden of the clause.

IUNO’s opinion

The case is a good example of how it can be difficult for companies to enforce non-competition clauses against employees in non-senior roles. Although a non-competition clause is proportional in terms of duration and compensation, it can still be unfair in other ways.

IUNO recommends that companies carefully consider whether an employee can be covered by a non-competition clause. Enforceability will require that the employee be compensated and not overly restricted for future career opportunities, among other things. 

We have previously written about a case where a district court set aside a non-competition clause here.

[The Arbitration Tribunal in Inventor and Non-compete disputes’ decision of the 21 January 2025]

A sales representative at a hardware chain was bound by a non-competition clause in his employment contract. When he resigned a few years later, the company informed him that the non-competition clause would be valid for three months. During those three months, he would receive 60 % of his monthly salary.

One month later, he became a sales manager at another hardware chain. As a result, the company wanted compensation for breach of the non-competition clause.

The Arbitration Tribunal found that the non-competition clause was unenforceable and rejected the company’s claim for compensation. The clause was too restrictive as the employee had not been employed in a senior role. Although he had gained insight into some company secrets, it was not enough to justify the financial burden of the clause.

IUNO’s opinion

The case is a good example of how it can be difficult for companies to enforce non-competition clauses against employees in non-senior roles. Although a non-competition clause is proportional in terms of duration and compensation, it can still be unfair in other ways.

IUNO recommends that companies carefully consider whether an employee can be covered by a non-competition clause. Enforceability will require that the employee be compensated and not overly restricted for future career opportunities, among other things. 

We have previously written about a case where a district court set aside a non-competition clause here.

[The Arbitration Tribunal in Inventor and Non-compete disputes’ decision of the 21 January 2025]

Receive our newsletter

Anders

Etgen Reitz

Partner

Alexandra

Jensen

Associate

Similar

logo
HR Legal

8 April 2025

Police officer with criminal relations was terminated

logo
HR Legal Technology

2 April 2025

Draft bill to ensure responsible use of AI

logo
HR Legal

28 March 2025

EFTA Court: Norway can restrict hiring of temporary agency workers

logo
HR Legal

27 March 2025

Self-organiser was not a self-organiser

logo
HR Legal

27 March 2025

Police assistant was dismissed for several data breaches

logo
HR Legal

7 March 2025

Employee became liable for competitive activities

The team

Alexandra

Jensen

Associate

Alma

Winsløw-Lydeking

Senior legal assistant

Anders

Etgen Reitz

Partner

Cecillie

Groth Henriksen

Senior associate

Elias

Lederhaas

Legal assistant

Emilie

Louise Børsch

Associate

Johan

Gustav Dein

Associate

Kirsten

Astrup

Managing associate

Maria

Kjærsgaard Juhl

Legal advisor

Sunniva

Løfsgaard

Legal assistant

Søren

Hessellund Klausen

Partner