EN
HR Legal

Employee became liable for competitive activities

logo
Legal news
calendar 7 March 2025
globus Norway

The Norwegian Court of Appeal has ordered a former employee to pay compensation for competitive activities that involved bringing one of the company’s biggest clients to his new business.

An employee with more than 20 years of experience started in a marketing agency where he quickly became responsible for one of the company’s biggest clients. However, after working with the client for a bit more than a year, he began to discuss the possibility of setting up a separate business to take over the work. He even involved a colleague in the planning.

A few months later, he resigned. His colleague followed shortly after, and the client terminated its contract with the company. Upon the expiry of his notice period, the former employee began to provide marketing services to the client via his new business.

The Court of Appeal concluded that the employee had breached his duty of loyalty and ordered him to pay NOK 100,000 in compensation to the company. It added that his new business also was liable for the amount, as it had breached the rules on good business practice.

IUNO’s opinion

The case shows that while the duty of loyalty may offer some protection, companies may want to consider using non-competition and non-solicitation clauses for key roles. The reason is that the duty of loyalty is limited to the employment and does not reach beyond the termination date. That said, breach of the duty of loyalty can serve as the basis for a compensation claim when companies suffer a financial loss.

IUNO recommends that companies assess the potential risks when deciding whether to include restrictive covenants in employment contracts. Without a clause, companies have to rely on the duty of loyalty alone when employees are engaging in competitive activities.

We have previously written about competitive activities here, where an employee was summarily dismissed, and here, where an employee became liable for NOK 2 million for competitive activities.

[Borgarting Court of Appeal's decision of 17 February 2025, in case LB-2024-102143]

An employee with more than 20 years of experience started in a marketing agency where he quickly became responsible for one of the company’s biggest clients. However, after working with the client for a bit more than a year, he began to discuss the possibility of setting up a separate business to take over the work. He even involved a colleague in the planning.

A few months later, he resigned. His colleague followed shortly after, and the client terminated its contract with the company. Upon the expiry of his notice period, the former employee began to provide marketing services to the client via his new business.

The Court of Appeal concluded that the employee had breached his duty of loyalty and ordered him to pay NOK 100,000 in compensation to the company. It added that his new business also was liable for the amount, as it had breached the rules on good business practice.

IUNO’s opinion

The case shows that while the duty of loyalty may offer some protection, companies may want to consider using non-competition and non-solicitation clauses for key roles. The reason is that the duty of loyalty is limited to the employment and does not reach beyond the termination date. That said, breach of the duty of loyalty can serve as the basis for a compensation claim when companies suffer a financial loss.

IUNO recommends that companies assess the potential risks when deciding whether to include restrictive covenants in employment contracts. Without a clause, companies have to rely on the duty of loyalty alone when employees are engaging in competitive activities.

We have previously written about competitive activities here, where an employee was summarily dismissed, and here, where an employee became liable for NOK 2 million for competitive activities.

[Borgarting Court of Appeal's decision of 17 February 2025, in case LB-2024-102143]

Receive our newsletter

Anders

Etgen Reitz

Partner

Similar

logo
HR Legal

9 April 2025

Not gender discrimination to pay male employee less

logo
HR Legal

8 April 2025

Police officer with criminal relations was terminated

logo
HR Legal Technology

2 April 2025

Draft bill to ensure responsible use of AI

logo
HR Legal

28 March 2025

EFTA Court: Norway can restrict hiring of temporary agency workers

logo
HR Legal

27 March 2025

Self-organiser was not a self-organiser

logo
HR Legal

27 March 2025

Police assistant was dismissed for several data breaches

The team

Alexandra

Jensen

Associate

Alma

Winsløw-Lydeking

Senior legal assistant

Anders

Etgen Reitz

Partner

Cecillie

Groth Henriksen

Senior associate

Elias

Lederhaas

Legal assistant

Emilie

Louise Børsch

Associate

Johan

Gustav Dein

Associate

Kirsten

Astrup

Managing associate

Maria

Kjærsgaard Juhl

Legal advisor

Sunniva

Løfsgaard

Legal assistant

Søren

Hessellund Klausen

Partner