EN
Corporate

Eco-friendly? Prove it!

logo
Legal news
calendar 30 January 2025
globus Denmark

In this newsletter, we delve into the requirements that companies must comply with when using general climate and environmental claims such as "eco-friendly," "good for the planet," and "sustainable."

Share video

When companies use environmental claims in their marketing, they must be able to document the accuracy of these statements. Otherwise, they risk violating the prohibition against misleading advertising under the Danish Marketing Act, which can result in hefty fines.

Specific or general?

Particularly strict requirements apply to companies using general claims like "eco-friendly," "good for the planet," and "sustainable." This is because general statements can be more challenging to substantiate than specific claims like "50% recycled plastic" or "silicone-free."

If you are considering using a general claim in a campaign, it is important to understand the rules and requirements fully.

Strict documentation requirements

Companies considering using general climate or environmental claims should first ensure that they can prove that the product is among the absolute best in its category from an environmental standpoint. This is a requirement when making general claims.

Additionally, the documentation must:

  • be based on a life cycle assessment of the product and
  • be supported by studies or statements from independent experts

Companies can avoid conducting a full life cycle assessment if the general claim is accompanied by an explanation. The explanation must provide consumers with the basis for the environmental claim and must be presented immediately alongside the claim. Companies must also be able to document the accuracy of the provided explanation.

If the product is certified under an official labelling scheme, such as the Nordic Swan Ecolabel or the EU Ecolabel, the life cycle assessment conducted as part of the certification process will suffice.

Be aware of the minimum requirements

In addition to documenting the accuracy of the claim, companies must also ensure that the product's climate or environmental benefit:

  • Is one of the product’s most significant climate or environmental benefits and is essential to its climate or environmental impact
  • Is not achieved in a manner that is harmful to the climate or environment
  • Is not substantially offset by other climate or environmental impacts of the product
  • Is not a common feature of similar products on the market

IUNO’s opinion

Businesses should take a close look at their campaigns if they include general environmental claims. Using specific claims instead is often a safer bet since they’re easier to back up. This helps reduce the administrative burden and lowers the risk of breaking the rules on misleading advertising under the Danish Marketing Act.

When companies use environmental claims in their marketing, they must be able to document the accuracy of these statements. Otherwise, they risk violating the prohibition against misleading advertising under the Danish Marketing Act, which can result in hefty fines.

Specific or general?

Particularly strict requirements apply to companies using general claims like "eco-friendly," "good for the planet," and "sustainable." This is because general statements can be more challenging to substantiate than specific claims like "50% recycled plastic" or "silicone-free."

If you are considering using a general claim in a campaign, it is important to understand the rules and requirements fully.

Strict documentation requirements

Companies considering using general climate or environmental claims should first ensure that they can prove that the product is among the absolute best in its category from an environmental standpoint. This is a requirement when making general claims.

Additionally, the documentation must:

  • be based on a life cycle assessment of the product and
  • be supported by studies or statements from independent experts

Companies can avoid conducting a full life cycle assessment if the general claim is accompanied by an explanation. The explanation must provide consumers with the basis for the environmental claim and must be presented immediately alongside the claim. Companies must also be able to document the accuracy of the provided explanation.

If the product is certified under an official labelling scheme, such as the Nordic Swan Ecolabel or the EU Ecolabel, the life cycle assessment conducted as part of the certification process will suffice.

Be aware of the minimum requirements

In addition to documenting the accuracy of the claim, companies must also ensure that the product's climate or environmental benefit:

  • Is one of the product’s most significant climate or environmental benefits and is essential to its climate or environmental impact
  • Is not achieved in a manner that is harmful to the climate or environment
  • Is not substantially offset by other climate or environmental impacts of the product
  • Is not a common feature of similar products on the market

IUNO’s opinion

Businesses should take a close look at their campaigns if they include general environmental claims. Using specific claims instead is often a safer bet since they’re easier to back up. This helps reduce the administrative burden and lowers the risk of breaking the rules on misleading advertising under the Danish Marketing Act.

Receive our newsletter

Aage

Krogh

Partner

Matilde

Grønlund Jakobsen

Senior Associate

Similar

logo
Corporate

17 February 2025

Specific environmental statements can still be misleading

logo
Corporate

24 January 2025

Environmental claims under scrutiny: The latest recommendations

logo
Corporate

9 January 2025

Denmark introduces easier financing and lower capital requirements

logo
Corporate

20 November 2024

Expensive words: Large fines for misleading environmental claims

logo
Corporate

21 October 2024

Encouraging tagging on SoMe is prohibited in Denmark

logo
Corporate

23 March 2022

Changes to the Danish Sale of Goods Act: Guarantees

The team

Aage

Krogh

Partner

Aurora

Maria Thunes Truyen

Associate

Caroline

Bruun Ibsen

Senior legal advisor

Frida

Assarson

Associate

Josephine

Gerner Amaloo

Legal assistant

Karoline

Skak Kristensen

Legal assistant

Mai

Haaning Kristensen

Legal assistant

Matilde

Grønlund Jakobsen

Senior Associate