EN
HR Legal

Companies must notify authorities of mass redundancies before they take effect

logo
Legal news
calendar 25 April 2025
globus Denmark

In a new opinion, the Advocate General of the European Court of Justice has concluded that an employee can only be terminated under the rules on mass redundancies if the company has notified the authorities in advance.

Insolvency proceedings were initiated against a German company, and the company decided to terminate all its employees.

Under both German and EU rules, companies must inform the competent authority if they intend to carry out mass redundancies.

The company had not done so. The parties disagreed on whether the company should terminate the employees again or whether it could validate the terminations by informing the authority afterwards.

The Advocate General rejected the company's attempt to provide information retrospectively. Therefore, the company had to start over, first notifying the authorities and then terminating the employees again.

IUNO's opinion

If the European Court of Justice follows the Advocate General's decision, companies that do not inform the Regional Employment Council of mass redundancies have, in principle, not terminated their employees. The Danish rules on mass redundancies allow for the same result, but the issue has not yet been tested before the Danish courts.

IUNO recommends that companies follow the mass redundancy procedure before carrying out mass redundancies. If not, there is a risk that employees will, in principle, remain employed with a right to salary until the company gives proper notice.

We will follow the case and update you when the European Court of Justice delivers their final ruling.

[Opinion of the Advocate General in case C-134/24 of 27 February 2025]

Insolvency proceedings were initiated against a German company, and the company decided to terminate all its employees.

Under both German and EU rules, companies must inform the competent authority if they intend to carry out mass redundancies.

The company had not done so. The parties disagreed on whether the company should terminate the employees again or whether it could validate the terminations by informing the authority afterwards.

The Advocate General rejected the company's attempt to provide information retrospectively. Therefore, the company had to start over, first notifying the authorities and then terminating the employees again.

IUNO's opinion

If the European Court of Justice follows the Advocate General's decision, companies that do not inform the Regional Employment Council of mass redundancies have, in principle, not terminated their employees. The Danish rules on mass redundancies allow for the same result, but the issue has not yet been tested before the Danish courts.

IUNO recommends that companies follow the mass redundancy procedure before carrying out mass redundancies. If not, there is a risk that employees will, in principle, remain employed with a right to salary until the company gives proper notice.

We will follow the case and update you when the European Court of Justice delivers their final ruling.

[Opinion of the Advocate General in case C-134/24 of 27 February 2025]

Receive our newsletter

Anders

Etgen Reitz

Partner

Søren

Hessellund Klausen

Partner

Kirsten

Astrup

Managing associate

Cecillie

Groth Henriksen

Senior associate

Johan

Gustav Dein

Associate

Emilie

Louise Børsch

Associate

Similar

logo
HR Legal

25 April 2025

A better collective agreement did not cover employee

logo
HR Legal

24 April 2025

Company could limit breastfeeding breaks to two hours

logo
HR Legal

9 April 2025

Not gender discrimination to pay male employee less

logo
HR Legal

8 April 2025

Police officer with criminal relations was terminated

logo
HR Legal Technology

2 April 2025

Draft bill to ensure responsible use of AI

logo
HR Legal

28 March 2025

EFTA Court: Norway can restrict hiring of temporary agency workers

The team

Alexandra

Jensen

Associate

Alma

Winsløw-Lydeking

Senior legal assistant

Anders

Etgen Reitz

Partner

Cecillie

Groth Henriksen

Senior associate

Elias

Lederhaas

Legal assistant

Emilie

Louise Børsch

Associate

Johan

Gustav Dein

Associate

Kirsten

Astrup

Managing associate

Maria

Kjærsgaard Juhl

Legal advisor

Sunniva

Løfsgaard

Legal assistant

Søren

Hessellund Klausen

Partner